Photosynthesis In Higher Plants MCQs With Answers – Part 4 (Class 11 Biology)
GKaim: Measure. Improve. Achieve.

Photosynthesis in Higher Plants MCQs with Answers – Part 4 (Class 11 Biology)

Timer: Off
Random: Off

301. Four graphs are described below. P. Wavelength against pigment absorption Q. Wavelength against oxygen evolution R. Light intensity against photosynthetic rate S. External carbon-dioxide concentration against photosynthetic rate Which interpretation correctly identifies the principal decision supplied by each graph?
ⓐ. P and Q both measure pigment concentration, while R and S identify chloroplast number
ⓑ. P gives pigment absorption, Q photosynthetic action, and R–S limitation or saturation
ⓒ. P gives a temperature curve, Q gives a water-response curve, and R and S are chromatograms
ⓓ. all four graphs measure the same variable and differ only in axis units
302. A C4 plant has normal Kranz anatomy, functional PEP carboxylase and normal OAA formation. A mutation prevents four-carbon acids from moving efficiently from mesophyll to bundle-sheath cells. Under high temperature, OAA accumulates in mesophyll cells, bundle-sheath carbon dioxide falls and phosphoglycolate formation increases. Which interpretation best integrates these observations?
ⓐ. RuBisCO has been replaced by PEP carboxylase in the bundle sheath
ⓑ. OAA accumulation has increased carbon-dioxide concentration around RuBisCO
ⓒ. failed acid transport lowers carbon concentration and raises oxygenation
ⓓ. phosphoglycolate formation shows that the Calvin cycle has accelerated
303. Four C4 leaf treatments are compared under high light and high temperature.
TreatmentMesophyll OAA formationAcid arrival in bundle sheathCarbon-dioxide retention near RuBisCOPhotorespiration
PHighHighHighNegligible
QHighHighLowHigh
RLowLowLowHigh
SHighLowLowModerate
Which treatment most specifically indicates defective carbon-dioxide retention by unusually gas-permeable bundle-sheath walls?
ⓐ. Treatment Q
ⓑ. Treatment R
ⓒ. Treatment S
ⓓ. Treatment P
304. Use the cellular arrangement described below. Cell P is a mesophyll cell containing PEP carboxylase. Cell Q is a bundle-sheath cell containing RuBisCO. A four-carbon acid moves from P to Q, where Step R releases carbon dioxide and a three-carbon compound. If Step R is selectively blocked, which paired change is expected first?
ⓐ. increased carbon dioxide near RuBisCO and increased PGA formation
ⓑ. reduced OAA formation in P and increased PEP regeneration in Q
ⓒ. increased oxygen release in Q and reduced light absorption in P
ⓓ. less carbon dioxide near RuBisCO and less three-carbon return product
305. A C4 leaf receives a \(5\)-second pulse of \(\mathrm{^{14}CO_2}\). Radioactivity first appears in mesophyll OAA. After a short delay, labelled carbon appears in bundle-sheath PGA. Which conclusion is most strongly supported by the time sequence?
ⓐ. PGA moves from bundle-sheath cells to mesophyll cells before OAA forms
ⓑ. Carbon enters a C4 mesophyll product before the bundle-sheath Calvin cycle
ⓒ. RuBisCO performs the first fixation of external carbon dioxide in mesophyll cells
ⓓ. OAA is produced only after labelled carbon has completed the Calvin cycle
306. Assertion: C4 plants can maintain greater net carbon gain than C3 plants under warm, bright conditions. Reason: Decarboxylation of four-carbon acids raises carbon-dioxide concentration around bundle-sheath RuBisCO and suppresses its oxygenase activity.
ⓐ. Both the Assertion and the Reason are true, and the Reason correctly explains the Assertion
ⓑ. Both the Assertion and the Reason are true, but the Reason does not explain the Assertion
ⓒ. The Assertion is true, whereas the Reason is false and cannot explain the Assertion
ⓓ. The Assertion is false, whereas the Reason is true and cannot explain the Assertion
307. Two illuminated plant preparations are supplied with isotopes.
PreparationWater suppliedCarbon dioxide suppliedOxygen gas released
P\(\mathrm{H_2^{18}O}\)Unlabelled \(\mathrm{CO_2}\)\(\mathrm{^{18}O_2}\)
QUnlabelled \(\mathrm{H_2O}\)\(\mathrm{C^{18}O_2}\)Predominantly unlabelled \(\mathrm{O_2}\)
Which conclusion is justified by the combined evidence?
ⓐ. carbon dioxide supplies the oxygen gas only when water is unlabelled
ⓑ. both water and carbon dioxide contribute equally to each oxygen molecule
ⓒ. oxygen gas is formed by reduction of labelled carbon dioxide in the stroma
ⓓ. photosynthetic oxygen originates from water rather than carbon dioxide
308. Two sealed flasks contain comparable destarched leaves. Flask P contains potassium hydroxide and is kept in darkness. Flask Q contains water instead of potassium hydroxide and is illuminated. After several hours, P lacks starch while Q contains starch. Why can this design not isolate the effect of carbon dioxide?
ⓐ. potassium hydroxide cannot absorb carbon dioxide in a sealed flask
ⓑ. light and carbon-dioxide availability changed together
ⓒ. destarching prevents all later starch formation
ⓓ. iodine cannot detect starch formed during illumination
309. Match each experimental component with its principal purpose. A Column II entry is used once.
Column IColumn II
P. Destarching a plant before treatment1. Absorb carbon dioxide from a closed space
Q. Potassium hydroxide in a flask2. Remove pre-existing starch reserves
R. Boiling a leaf in alcohol3. Remove chlorophyll so the iodine result can be seen clearly
S. Leaving part of the same leaf exposed to light4. Provide an internal comparison for the covered region
ⓐ. P-1, Q-2, R-4, S-3
ⓑ. P-3, Q-4, R-1, S-2
ⓒ. P-2, Q-1, R-3, S-4
ⓓ. P-4, Q-3, R-2, S-1
310. In an Engelmann-type experiment, a filamentous green alga is illuminated with a spectrum, but the aerobic bacteria used as indicators are altered so that they no longer move toward oxygen. The alga continues photosynthesising normally. If bacteria become uniformly distributed, what is the strongest conclusion?
ⓐ. every wavelength now produces exactly the same amount of oxygen
ⓑ. bacterial distribution no longer reveals the action spectrum
ⓒ. the alga has lost chlorophyll a from its reaction centres
ⓓ. photosynthetic oxygen must now originate from carbon dioxide
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Scroll to Top